 |
Follow us on Facebook and
Twitter |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
A homeland for road
rogues. - by
Julius Dilemma
(31/10/2011) |
|
| |
|
|
|

Julius's fictitious double cab
BMW Homelander. |
|
Who
am I to generalise, because
it is a dangerous science.
And it can get you in
trouble too. Take rugby
players for example.
Somebody once said that not
all rugby players are
stupid, but that all stupid
people play rugby. He is not
with us anymore.
Bearing
that – and the fact that I
don’t have any facts or
figures to verify my
findings – in mind, I have
come to the conclusion that
road rogues can be divided
into four categories. He or
she drives a BMW. His or her
car has an NW registration
plate. He drives a pre-2005
double cab. He drives a taxi.
|
|
|
| |
How
did I come to this
staggering conclusion? Well,
BMW owners think they are
rich and because of that,
they expect respect from the
rest of us. Pre-2005 double
cab owners are pissed off
because they’re not rich.
NW
plate carriers? Well, they
are (n)o (w)here, if you
catch my drift. Taxi drivers
are everywhere.
What’s the solution to the
problem? Let’s organise a
strike and march to BMW’s
headquarters, demanding that
they design and build a
cheap BMW double cab. We
then get Julius to
unilaterally change our
sacred constitution to force
BMW double-cab owners to go
and live wherever NW is.
Something similar to a
homeland in the apartheid
days.
We’ll
then have all the
padvarke in one kraal, leaving them to irritate, annoy, endanger and
eliminate each other.
What
about taxi drivers? Goodness
knows. They’re a law unto
themselves. It seems that
even our highly respected
policemen and women are
scared of and subservient to
them.
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Track vs field.
- by Adri Bezuidenhout
(03/09/2011) |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Who are the most skilled drivers? Those
behind the wheel of a Formula One car, or
those flying through a forest on a special
stage during a World Rally Championship
(WRC) event?
It is a question often asked but seldom
resolved.
In a way, it’s like comparing fast and spin
bowlers in cricket. Many fast bowlers find
themselves in national squads at the
relatively tender age of 22. Spin bowling is
a different kettle of fish
altogether. Great spinners such as
Australians Richie Benaud and Shane Warne,
or our own Pat Symcox, only made their mark
in their late twenties and thereafter.
Formula One drivers are like fast bowlers.
The late Bruce McLaren won his first Grand
Prix – at Sebring in America in 1959 – when
he was 22 years old. Emerson Fittipaldi
became world champion – in 1972 - when he
was 25. Red Bull Racing’s Sebastian Vettel
re-wrote the record books when he became the
youngest champion that Formula One has ever
produced. He was only 23 years and 135 days
when he clinched the title during the last
race of the 2010 season in Abu Dhabi.
The following appeared in F1 Racing, The
world’s best-selling F1 magazine: “Of all
the drivers who have competed in F1 in the
past five years, only two who made their F1
debut over the age of 23 have won a grand
prix.
This prompted former McLaren driver and
currently Formula One TV commentator for the
BBC, David Coulthard, to remark about all
the young drivers as follows: “Mum packs
your bags and off you go to a Grand Prix.”
Sebatien Loeb won his first of many WRC
titles when he was 30 years old. Hannu
Mikkola was 41 and Bjorn Waldegard 39 when
they carried the world rally crown for the
first time.
Maybe one should look at the careers of two
Formula One stars to come to a conclusion.
Kimi Raikkonen won the Formula One drivers’
title in 2007. He subsequently took up
rallying with dismal results. His sponsors
get tremendous coverage though thanks to
photographs and TV coverage of Kimi’s car
lying in a ditch after one of his many
accidents.
Renault Formula One driver Robert Kubica
also tried his hand at rallying. This
prompted him to remark: “I’ve tried rallying
and I know what big balls these guys have.
Big balls.” Robert was later involved in a
serious accident behind the wheel of a rally
car which put him out of the 2011 season
thus far. Hopefully he will recover to
continue his potentially brilliant career in
Formula One.
So, who are the best drivers? To me, Formula
One, with massive and endless run-off areas
scattered around the circuits for safety
reasons is a glorified form of video games.
You can go off the circuit almost anywhere
without serious consequences. If you go off
a tree- or boulder-lined road in a rally car
you are in for a rude awakening. You might,
as the late and outspoken Australian racing
legend Frank Gardner once put it, attend
your own barbeque.
Frank died of natural causes close on 80
years of age. Fortunately he didn’t have to
attend his own barbeque.
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Strategic racing: What a farce. (part
2)
- by Adri Bezuidenhout |
|
| |
|
|
| |
 |
|
Hate
to say so, but I told you
so. In my first instalment
for We discuss entitled
Grand Prix farce pasted on
this site earlier (see
below). I gave you my
reasons why modern-day
Formula One racing has
become a show to attract
large TV audiences. Why it
isn’t pure racing anymore,
thanks to so-called
short-life tyres developed
to induce excitement.
Since
then I came across a number
of interesting quotations
that strengthen my case even
more. Here are some of them.
|
|
|
“In 2011 we have
tyres of limited life, tyres which
‘go off’ abruptly so that the timing
of pit stops is more crucial than
ever to the outcome of a race.”
Seasoned Formula One reporter Nigel
Roebuck in Motor Sport, the original
motor racing magazine in the UK.
“The Chinese Grand Prix was all
about tyres and we’d better get used
to that.” Nigel Roebuck once again.
“So you bring in things to spice it
up – and then you ask: ‘Where’s the
race gone?’ They start and then they
get all muddled up and the race
finishes and you can’t work out what
happened. That’s a danger.” Damon
Hill. 1996 world champion Damon
Hill.
Maybe, just maybe, I’ve got it all
wrong. Or have I? This is what
former Formula One driver and later
TV commentator on A1GP John Watson
believes: “With the BBC (referring
to their TV coverage of Formula One
races) the biggest proportion of the
audience are those who aren’t
enthusiasts.”
This remark opened my eyes. The
Formula One show, thanks to all the
gimmicks they have brought in, is
staged to attract those who aren’t
enthusiasts.
Maybe former Formula One driver and
currently BBC TV commentator Martin
Brundle hit the nail on the head
when he stated: “Formula One is
moving more and more to video
games.”
In my first instalment of Grand Prix
farce I also elaborated on the
message Pirelli is conveying to the
buying public regarding the
durability of their road-going
tyres. I stated: How the decision
makers at Pirelli could allow
themselves to become part of such a
farce boggles the mind. What is the
message they convey to a
mega-massive, world-wide TV
audience? Our tyres aren’t up to it.
They don’t last.
The following strengthens my case.
“Jenson Button steers clear of the
treacherous marbles off-line caused
by the rapid degradation of the new
Pirelli rubber.” A caption to a
photograph in the July edition of F1
Racing, the most informative
publication in the world of Formula
One:
“To produce a race tyre with a very
limited life? If you watch a race –
and don’t know the rules – you might
conclude that that manufacturer’s
tyres don’t last very long.” A
Bridgestone representative when
asked about the short-life tyres
Pirelli is compelled to supply to
Formula One teams.
“It astounds me that a company such
as Pirelli has been persuaded to
build an artificially ineffective
tyre. If I was merely quite
interested in motor racing, and –
without knowing the background –
casually watched a 2011 Grand Prix,
I’m not sure that my conclusion,
when next buying tyres, would be
that Pirelli tyres would be the
things to have.” Nigel Roebuck.
Your views on this subject would be
appreciated. Click
here to submit
your valued opinion or send an email
to
info@wheelsannual.co.za.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Strategic racing: What a farce. (part
1)
- by Adri Bezuidenhout
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Modern-day Grand
Prix racing has become a show. In fact, it
has degenerated into a total farce. Here are
a few reasons why. |
|
| |
 |
|
In days gone by a Formula One driver
got a car filled with petrol and
fitted with four tyres that would
last the distance of the race. It
was man and machine against man and
machine.
When Pirelli became the sole tyre
supplier for Formula One at the
beginning of the 2011 season, they
were told - instructed is a better
word - by the FIA, the controlling
body of motorsport, to develop tyres
that would not last more than 14 or
15 laps during a race. The objective
was to force drivers into the pits
for tyre changes at least three
times during a Grand Prix.
|
|
|
| |
It has become nothing less than artificially
inducing excitement into a business - not a
sport anymore.
Racing should take place on the race track,
not in the pits. The outcome should be in
the hands of the driver, not on tyre wear,
how quickly wheels can be changed or where
the driver flows into the race after one of
his many visits to the pits.
So what happens? Grand Prix races have
become economy runs based on tyre wear. You
beg to differ? Well, this is what Lewis
Hamilton’s race engineer told him on lap 48
of the 56 lap Grand Prix in China: “Keep
looking after your tyres. Other cars are
struggling badly on their tyres.” This is
followed a few laps later by yet another
instruction by the very same engineer: “You
are sixth tenths faster than Vettel. Look
after your tyres.”
This prompted BBC commentator Martin Brundle
to remark: “That is not how Hamilton likes
going racing.”
You still disagree? At one stage during the
Grand Prix in China, Sebatian Vettel was
lapping a full ten seconds a lap slower than
his qualifying lap. One understands why if
you listen to his remark after the race:
“You have to be patient and look after your
tyres.”
Be patient? Look after your tyres?
Sir Stirling Moss once critised drivers who
race for points rather than victories.
“That’s not racing, that’s driving,” he
said.
Wonder what his views are on the tyre farce,
seeing that the drivers are driving, not
racing.
Martin Brundle likes the show. After the
race in China he enthused: “I love this new
setup in Formula One. It’s about tyre wear
isn’t it? And there is so much going on in
the pits.” But then, Brundle was a driver,
never a racer.
Fellow commentator David Coulthard was very
proud of Hamilton’s victory: “Hamilton has
made great use of his tyres this afternoon.”
Made great use of his tyres? That’s not
racing, that’s driving.
Then comes the jewel in the crown.
Commentator Coulthard proclaimed with utter
delight: “Thank you Pirelli. What they have
given us is great strategic racing.”
Strategic racing? Before it was called
racing, now it has become strategic racing.
True racing greats such as Fangio, Senna and
Gilles Villeneuve must have turned in their
graves when Coulthard came up with that
ridiculous statement.
|
|
| |
If strategic
racing in Formula One is so great,
why not strategic Olympics? Imagine
Usain Bolt getting a pair of running
shoes that will wear out before the
finish line during the 200-metre
final.
If he runs a strategic race, he
might win. If not, the spikes on his
specially designed shoes will wear
out, enabling slower runners to
overtake him.
Ridiculous? Maybe, but so is present
day Grand Prix racing. |
|
 |
|
|
| |
Guess who said the following: “Grand Prix
racing is not as pure as it was in the past.
We have gone too far with artificial
elements. It’s like telling footballers to
wear tennis shoes in the rain. To have so
many pit stops. I want to see competition. I
want to see cars on the track. I don’t want
to see competition in the pits. In the last
Grand Prix there were 80 pit stops. Come on,
it’s too much. And viewers don’t understand
anymore because drivers come out of the pits
and they – the viewers - don’t know what
position he is in.” It is a verbatim remark
by Ferrari president Luca di Montezemolo. I
couldn’t wish for a bigger name to support
my concern about modern day so-called Grand
Prix racing.
Just another thought. How the decision
makers at Pirelli could allow themselves to
become part of such a farce boggles the
mind. What is the message they convey to a
mega-massive, world-wide TV audience? “Our
tyres aren’t up to it. They don’t last.”
I call Martin Brundle to the witness stand
once again to strengthen my case. After the
Grand Prix in China he said: “There is at
least half a ton of discarded rubber on the
race track by the end of the Grand Prix.”
That is half a ton of Pirelli rubber. Shreds
from tyres that don’t last. Bad publicity,
very bad publicity.
Come to think of it, maybe that’s why
Bridgestone told the FIA to go away with a
two-fingered wave at the end of the 2010
season. Maybe, just maybe, they weren’t
willing to produce 15-lap tyres to spruce up
the Grand Prix show.
Click
here
to submit your views or send an email to
info@wheelsannual.co.za and let us have
it from the hip.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
The information contained on this
website, including attachments is meant to serve as
information only.
The publishers of WHEELS and its
editorial team do not accept any liability regarding details
contained on this website.
© Copyright 2011 Wheels Annual.
For more information, please click here to read our internet disclaimer.
|
|
Website developed by:
|
|